Newsletter Subscribe
Home View Cart My Account
Go
A Product Priority Code is a product's three or four digit identification number that will navigate you directly to that product’s page. To receive product priority codes and associated product discount coupons, sign up for our mailing list.

Judgment of the English Court of Appeal rendered in 2001 in case 207 [2001] EWCA Civ 1755 - SAR 2003 - 1

 
Price:
$35.00
Page Count: 44
Published: 2003
Media Desc: 1 PDF Version from "Stockholm Arbitration Reporter"
File Size: 356KB
Qty:
 
 
Description

   Click to view: 

Stockholm Arbitration Report (SAR) - (Individual Back Volumes)
Stockholm Arbitration Report (SAR) - (Individual Back Issue)


 Preview Page SAR 2003 - 1

Subject matter:
Costs incurred in foreign jurisdiction. A party was unable to recover
costs in foreign proceedings. Whether party was entitled to recover foreign
costs as damages for breach of exclusive jurisdiction clause in subsequent
proceedings.
Finding:
In breach of an exclusive jurisdiction clause a party litigated in a
jurisdiction, except occasionally, did not award costs in strike out
proceedings. Therefore the party who successfully applied for the strike out
did not ask for costs. Justice requires that the party should receive the
damages it had suffered by reason of the breach. The situation is akin to
malicious prosecution.
Parties:
Claimant: Union Discount Company Ltd.
Respondent: 1. Robert Zoller & others
2. Union Cal Ltd.
Place of Court Proceedings:
London, England
Applicable Law:
English
EXTRACT FROM THE JUDGMENT
“In the Supreme Court of Judicature Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
on Appeal from HH Judge Heppel Q.C. Sitting as a Judge of the High
Court.