Newsletter Subscribe
Home View Cart My Account
Go
A Product Priority Code is a product's three or four digit identification number that will navigate you directly to that product’s page. To receive product priority codes and associated product discount coupons, sign up for our mailing list.

Bulgaria - Arbitration Law and Practice in Central and Eastern Europe

 
Price:
$35.00
Author: Silvy V. Chernev
Page Count: 62
Published: June 2006
Media Desc: PDF from "Arbitration Law and Practice in Central and Eastern Europe"
File Size: 196KB
Qty:
 
 
Description

Originally From:

Arbitration Law and Practice in Central and Eastern Europe - Hardcover

Arbitration Law and Practice in Central and Eastern Europe - Electronic


Bulgaria - Preview Page

1. GENERAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK
1.1 National law
a) Current status
What is the current status? When was it enacted? Have there already been amendments?

The current legislative framework for arbitration in the Republic of Bulgaria is provided by the Civil Procedure Code (the “CPC)” and the Law on International Commercial Arbitration1 (the “LICA”).2

Arbitration, as a means for alternative dispute resolution, has existed in Bulgaria since the first Bulgarian Law on Civil Procedure was adopted in 1892. Similar provisions were later reproduced in the second Bulgarian Law on Civil Procedure enacted in 1930. The first arbitrations took place within the system of the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (the “BCCI”) after 1896, when rules concerning arbitration were
adopted by the newly founded BCCI. Arbitration, however, did not acquire great popularity in Bulgaria before World War II for various reasons. One major obstacle was that it was originally envisaged that voluntary arbitration could only be used to resolve existing disputes, and not future ones. Another important factor was that the law did not oblige arbitrators to apply the relevant legislation with respect to the substance of
the case. The practical result was that the sheer bulk of the disputes were decided by arbitrators acting as amiable compositeurs (ex aequo et bono). The fact that Bulgaria never ratified the 1923 Geneva Protocol on Arbitration Clauses or the Convention on the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards was an additional obstacle.

 

Table of Contents

Full Table of Contents from:
Arbitration Law and Practice in Central and Eastern Europe

Table of Contents


Preface  

Editors and Contributors  

Questionnaire

Albania
by
Enyal Shuke

Austria
by
Christoph Liebscher

Belarus
by
Yan I. Funk and Vladimir Khvalei

Bulgaria
by
Silvy V. Chernev

Croatia
by
Alan Uzelac and Tomislav Nagy

Czech Republic

by
Dušan Ruzič and Jan Horky

Hungary
by
István Varga

Kazakhstan
by
Azamat Kuatbekov and Igor Kolupayev

Latvia
by
Ziedonis Ūdris and Inga Kačevska

Lithuania
by
Emilis Cicenas and Vilija Vaitkute Pavan

Poland
by
Bartosz Krużewski and Tomasz Wardyński

Russian Federation
by
David Goldberg, Gordon Blanke and Julia Zagonek

Serbia
by
Tijana Kojović

Slovakia
by
Luboš Frolkovic and Pavol Biksadsky

Slovenia
by
Krešo Puharič and Sabina Kač

Ukraine
by
Tatyana Slipachuk

PART II
Note on Part II
Questionnaire template 2

Questionnaire on arbitration and ADR practice in:
(responses by arbitration specialists)

Bulgaria

Croatia

the Czech Republic


Hungary

Kazakhstan

Latvia

Poland

Romania

the Russian Federation

Serbia

the Slovak Republic

Ukraine

Questionnaire template 3
Questionnaire on arbitration and ADR practice in:
(responses by institutions)

Croatia

the Czech Republic

Estonia

Serbia

Index

Author Detail

About the Author:

Silvy Vasilev Chernev, Ph.D. (Bulgaria) is President of the Court of Arbitration at the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.