Newsletter Subscribe
Home View Cart My Account
Go
A Product Priority Code is a product's three or four digit identification number that will navigate you directly to that product’s page. To receive product priority codes and associated product discount coupons, sign up for our mailing list.

Guatemala - National Report - World Arbitration Reporter (WAR) - 2nd Edition

 
Price:
$35.00
Author: Lic. Luis Fernando Bermejo Quiñónez
Page Count: 60
Published: January 2010
Last Updated: November 2010
Media Desc: PDF from "World Arbitration Reporter (WAR) - 2nd Edition"
File Size: 469 KB
Qty:
 
 
Description

Originally from:  

World Arbitration Reporter - 2nd Edition - Looseleaf

World Arbitration Reporter - 2nd Edition - Electronic


GUATEMALA

Lic. Luis Fernando Bermejo Quiñónez

I. INTRODUCTION: ARBITRATION IN GUATEMALA –
HISTORY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

A. History and Current Legislation on Arbitration

1. Historical evolution of law relating to arbitration

The law applicable to arbitration until recently did not facilitate the development of arbitration as an effective dispute resolution method. The Code of Civil and Commercial Procedure of 1934 (“Código de Enjuiciamiento Civil y Mercantil”), which essentially repeated the provisions of the law applicable to arbitration that was common in other countries at the time, provided that the arbitration agreement had to be formalized in a compromiso. The compromiso, in the event of a dispute, had to be executed in a public deed that was required to state the full name of the arbitrators, the dispute to be solved by arbitration, the time period in which to deliver the award and the place of arbitration. In the event one of the parties did not abide by its commitment to execute the compromiso, the law established a summary judgment procedure (“vía ejecutiva”) to enforce the arbitration agreement so that the judge could order the formalization of the compromiso. The obligation to execute the compromiso and the lack of expeditiousness in the judicial procedures to enforce the arbitration agreement, among other factors, resulted in a major setback to the development of arbitration as an effective tool of dispute resolution.

The legislators, being conscious of the issues raised by the previous law on arbitration, changed the procedure to enforce the arbitration agreement in case of a party’s default in executing the compromiso. The Code of Civil and Commercial Procedure of 1964 (“Código Procesal Civil y Mercantil”), along with other reforms, established an incidental procedure, rather than a summary judgment procedure, to enforce the arbitration agreement. However, the introduced reforms did not translate into an acceptance of arbitration as an effective dispute resolution method and it was seldom recommended by lawyers to their clients, because the law among other reasons:

Table of Contents

GUATEMALA

I. INTRODUCTION: ARBITRATION IN GUATEMALA – HISTORY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

A. History and Current Legislation on Arbitration

1. Historical evolution of law relating to arbitration

2. Current law

3. Law reform projects

4. Confidentiality and publication of awards 

a) Privacy of proceedings

b) Publication of awards

B. Arbitration Infrastructure and Practice in Guatemala

1. Major arbitration institutions

2. Number of cases and other statistics

3. Development of arbitration compared with litigation 

II. CURRENT LAW AND PRACTICE

A. Arbitration Agreement

1. Types and validity of agreement

a) Clauses and submission agreements

b) Minimum essential content

c) Form requirements

d) Incorporation by reference

e) Interpretation

2. Enforcing arbitration agreements

a) Declaratory actions in court

b) Applications to compel or stay arbitration

c) Anti-suit and other injunctions

3. Effects on third parties

a) Extension of the agreements over third parties

b) Other effects

4. Termination and breach 

B. Doctrine of Separability 

1. Statutory provisions

2. Practice and case law

C. Jurisdiction

1. Which forum decides jurisdiction 

2. Prima Facie determination

3. Competence-competence

4. Interaction of national courts and tribunals

D. Arbitrability 

1. Notion and functions of arbitrability 

2. Applicable law

3. Subjective arbitrability 

a) Natural persons

b) Legal persons

c) States and state entities

4. Objective arbitrability

a) Examples of restrictions to objective arbitrability at law

b) Cases restricting objective arbitrability

E. Arbitral Tribunal

1. Status and qualifications of arbitrators

a) Number of arbitrators

b) Legal status

c) Qualifications and accreditation requirements

d) Arbitrators’ rights and duties

e) Relevant codes of ethics

2. Appointment of arbitrators

a) Methods of appointment

b) Appointing authorities

c) Payment agreements

d) Resignation and its consequences

3. Challenge and removal 

a) Grounds for challenge

b) Procedure for challenge

c) Removal procedure

d) Replacement of arbitrators

4. Arbitrator liability and immunity

F. Conducting the Arbitration

1. Law governing procedure 

a) Determination of law and rules governing procedure

b) Notion and role of seat of arbitration

c) Methods for selection of seat absent party choice

d) Mandatory rules of procedure

2. Conduct of arbitration

a) Basic procedural principles

b) Party autonomy and arbitrators’ power to determine procedure

c) Style and characteristics pf the oral hearing

d) Documents only arbitrations

e) Submissions and notifications

f) Deadlines and methods for their extension

g) Legal representation

h) Default proceedings

3. Taking of evidence

a) Admissibility

b) Burden of proof

c) Standards of proof

d) Evidentiary means- in general

e) Documentary evidence and privilege

f) Production of documents

g) Witnesses

h) Tribunal-appointed experts

i) Party-appointed experts

4. Interim measures of protections

a) Jurisdiction for granting interim measures

b) Availability of preliminary or ex parte orders

c) Types of measures

d) Form of measures

e) Security for costs

f) Enforcement mechanisms

5. Interaction between national courts and arbitration tribunals

a) Court assistance before the arbitration begins

b) Court assistance during the arbitration

c) Court assistance after the arbitration

d) Case law examples of best and worst practices

6. Multiparty, multi-action and multi-contract arbitration

a) Consolidation of arbitrations

b) Joinder of third parties

c) Parallel and concurrent proceedings

7. Law and rules of law applicable to the merits

a) Determining the applicable law and rules

b) Party autonomy

c) Determination of arbitrators

d) Non-national substantive rules, general principles of law and transnational rules

e) Mandatory rules

8. Costs

a) Arbitration costs

b) Legal costs

c) Security for costs

G. Arbitration Award

1. Types of awards 

a) Partial awards

b) Final awards

c) Interim awards

d) Consent awards

e) Default awards

f) Awards and other decisions of the tribunal

2. Form requirements 

a) Essential content

b) Reasons

c) Time limits for making award

d) Notification to parties and registration

3. Remedies

a) Damages

b) Specific-performance

c) Other typical remedies

d) Interest

4. Decision making

a) Deliberations

b) Majority or consensus?

c) Dissenting and concurring opinions

d) Signature

5. Settlement

a) Settlement recorded in an award

b) Settlement without an award

c) Use of settlement techniques by arbitrators

6. Effects of award

a) Effects between parties

b) Effects against third parties

c) Res judicata

7. Correction, supplementation, and amendment

a) Correcting the award

b) Additional award

c) Interpretation of award

H. Challenge and Other Actions against the Award 

1. Setting aside

a) Grounds

b) Time limits

c) Procedure

d) Limiting judicial review of awards by contract

e) Effects of successful challenge

2. Appeal on the merits

a) Is it allowed?

b) Grounds

c) Excluding the right to appeal by agreement

III. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF AWARDS

A. Domestic Awards 

1. Statutory or other regimes

a) Distinction between recognition and enforcement

b) Grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement

c) Formal requirements for enforcement of awards

d) Enforcement procedure

e) Execution

2. Practice

a) Grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement

b) Execution

B. Foreign Awards

1. Various regulatory regimes

a) Domestic rules

b) New York Convention

c) Other international conventions

d) Court practice applying regimes other than the New York Convention

2. Distinction between recognition and enforcement

3. Application of New York Convention by local courts

a) Grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement

b) Enforcement procedure

c) Public policy as a ground to refuse enforcement

d) Examples from practice

IV. APPENDICES AND RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS

A. National Legislation (See CD-ROM) 

B. Major Arbitration Institutions

C. Statistics

 

 

Author Detail

Lic. Luis Fernando Bermejo Quiñónez has been a Partner of Bermejo & Asociados since 2008 and is co-head of the firm’s litigation and arbitration group. Luis has represented clients in domestic and international arbitrations under institutional and ad hoc rules and in litigation of international character. Luis has lectured on international arbitration at the Universidad del Istmo, Guatemala and on international investment law at the Universidad Francisco Marroquín. He received his law degree from Universidad Francisco Marroquín, Guatemala and his Master’s degree from Universidad de Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, where he specialized in international investment law.