Newsletter Subscribe
Home View Cart My Account
Go
A Product Priority Code is a product's three or four digit identification number that will navigate you directly to that product’s page. To receive product priority codes and associated product discount coupons, sign up for our mailing list.

Colorado - Chapter 6 - Fundamentals of Insurance Coverage in all 50 States - 3rd Edition

 
Price:
$35.00
Author: Bradley W. Matthiesen, Gary L. Wickert & Douglas W. Lehrer
Page Count: 18
Published: January 2011
Media Desc: PDF from "Fundamentals of Insurance Coverage in all 50 States - 3rd Edition"
File Size: 187 KB
Qty:
 
 
Description

Originally from:

Fundamentals of Insurance Coverage in all 50 States - 3rd Edition - Hardcover

Fundamentals of Insurance Coverage in all 50 States - 3rd Edition - Electronic


Preview Page

Colorado

Bradley W. Matthiesen, Gary L. Wickert & Douglas W. Lehrer

I. THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE
A. Proving the Existence and Terms of Insurance Policies
Under Colorado law, a party has the burden of proof as to the elements of his
case, Exchange Nat’l Bank v. Sparkman, 191 Colo. 534, 554 P.2d 1090 (Colo.
1976). The party asserting the affirmative of an issue has the burden to prove that
issue. Atlantic & Pacific Ins. Co. v. Barnes, 666 P.2d 163 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983).
Thus, it is likely the insured has the burden of proving the insurance contract and
its terms, as well as the loss. The insurer must prove the contents of any exclusions
or limitations on the coverage amount on which it relies in defense. West v. Credit
Life Ins. Co., 30 Colo. App. 455, 494 P.2d 601 (Colo. 1972).
B. Missing Insurance Policies
1. Extent of the Burden of Proof
No Colorado court has yet addressed the evidentiary standard relating to a
missing insurance policy.
2. Proof of Contents of Missing Policies
The best evidence rule provides that, with some exceptions, no evidence
other than the original of a writing is admissible to prove the contents of a writing.
C.R.E. § 1002 (1995). Before secondary evidence is admissible, the absence of
primary evidence must be explained. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Smith, 3 Colo. 422
(Colo. 1877). Where a party has negligently or fraudulently destroyed primary
evidence, he cannot introduce secondary evidence. Breen v. Richardson, 6 Colo.
605 (Colo. 1883). In general, to recover on a lost instrument, the evidence of the
former existence, execution, delivery, loss and instrument contents should be clear
and convincing. Gooch v. Rodewald, 164 Colo. 88, 432 P.2d 755 (Colo. 1967).

 

Table of Contents

COLORADO

I. The Contract of Insurance
A. Proving the Existence and Terms of Insurance Policies
B. Missing Insurance Policies
1. Extent of the Burden of Proof
2. Proof of Contents of Missing Policies

II. Procedural Considerations
A. Law Governing the Insurance Policy
B. Direct Action Statutes
C. Statutes of Limitations
1. Breach of Contract
2. Tort--Bad Faith

III. Construction and Interpretation
A. What Is an Ambiguity?
B. General Contract Rules for Resolving Ambiguities
C. Rule That Ambiguities Are Resolved against Insurer
D. Limitations of "Constructions against Insurer" Rule

IV. Extent of Risks and Coverage
A. Insurable Risks
1. Expectations of the Parties
2. Liability Created or Enlarged during Policy Period
B. Insurability of Punitive Damages
C. Assignment and Transfer of Policies of Insurance
1. Transfer of Insured Property
2. Assignability of Policy
3. Consent of the Insurer
4. Exceptions to Consent Requirement
5. Reorganizations and Acquisitions

V. Rights and Obligations of the Parties
A. Duty of Insurer to Defend
1. Trigger of the Duty
2. Control of the Defense

VI. Insurer's Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
A. Insurer's Duty to the Insured
1. Statutory Source/Unfair Competition--Deceptive Practices
(C.R.S. § 10-3-1104 (1989)
2. Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

VII. Policy Defenses
A. Cooperation
B. Notice
C. Misrepresentation
1. False Statements
2. Materiality
3. Intent
D. Breach of Warranty
E. Failure to Pay Premiums

VIII. Environmental Issues and Insurance Law
A. Duty to Defend in Absence of Lawsuit
B. Occurrence/Accidental Event
1. Property Damage and Trigger of Coverage
2. Expected/Intended
C. Damages and Equitable Relief
D. Allocation
E. Personal Injury Liability Coverage
F. Policy Exclusions
1. Insured's Owned Property Exclusion Clause
2. Pollution Exclusion Clause

 

Author Detail

The three authors of this treatise form the nucleus of one of the most respected insurance litigation firms in the world. Together, they bring a total of more than 75 years of litigation experience to bear on their clients' insurance defense and coverage needs. 

Bradley W. Matthiesen is a Senior Partner with the law firm of Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer, S.C., where he has been an insurance defense trial attorney for the past 12 years. He has litigated and tried numerous personal injury, insurance coverage, toxic tort, lemon-law and Magnuson-Moss warranty cases for individual insureds, insurance companies and numerous automobile dealerships throughout Wisconsin. In addition, Mr. Matthiesen has strived to provide legal services in all matters relating to a general practice law firm. Mr. Matthiesen has particularly strong ties to the insurance industry, especially insurance defense litigation. Mr. Matthiesen worked in the insurance industry for many years, and earned his C.P.C.U. and C.L.U. designations. He is also a past C.C.I.C. Arbitration Committee Vice Chairman and an Instructor at the American Institute of Paralegal Studies. 

Gary L. Wickert is a Senior Partner with the law firm of Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer, S.C., and is regarded as one of the world's leading experts on insurance subrogation in all lines of insurance. He is the author of several subrogation books and legal treatises and is a national and international speaker and lecturer on subrogation and motivational topics. Mr. Wickert is also a published commercial fiction author and a politician in Wisconsin. Licensed in both Texas and Wisconsin, Mr. Wickert is double board-certified in both personal injury law and civil trial law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. He is also certified as a Civil Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy, for whom he has both written and graded the product liability questions contained on the NBTA national certification exam taken by trial lawyers around the country. For nearly 25 years, Mr. Wickert has served as an expert witness and insurance consultant on subrogation and insurance related issues and has been consulted by insurance carriers, lawyers, and legislative bodies from several states. He is a licensed arbitrator and has attended more than 1,000 mediations in more than 30 different states.

Douglas W. Lehrer is a Senior Partner with the law firm of Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer, S.C. Mr. Lehrer's insurance defense practice spans the spectrum of insurance related issues, including defending insureds and their insurers in response to claims of personal injury, property damage and wrongful death. His experience includes the handling of countless lawsuits arising out of automobile collisions, slip and falls, product liability claims, toxic tort claims and construction and work site accidents. He has a long history of representing insurance companies on all types of insurance coverage disputes, as well as defending insurers in response to claims of bad faith. Mr. Lehrer oversees a significant number of the firm's complicated and significant coverage dispute cases, and has handled the trial of such insurance coverage matters as well as subsequent appeals.