Newsletter Subscribe
Home View Cart My Account
Go
A Product Priority Code is a product's three or four digit identification number that will navigate you directly to that product’s page. To receive product priority codes and associated product discount coupons, sign up for our mailing list.

Determining Jurisdiction and Arbitrability - Chapter 4 - The College of Commercial Arbitrators Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration - 2nd Edition

 
Price:
$35.00
Author: R. Doak Bishop, Robert B. Davidson, Barry H. Garfinkel and June R. Lehrman
Page Count: 11
Published: October 2010
Media Desc: PDF from "The College of Commercial Arbitrators Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration - 2nd Edition"
File Size: 179 KB
Qty:
 
 
Description

  Originally from:  

The College of Commercial Arbitrators Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration - 2nd Edition - Hardcover

The College of Commercial Arbitrators Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration - 2nd Edition - Electronic

 


 CHAPTER 4

DETERMINING JURISDICTION AND
ARBITRABILITY
Arbitrators should ensure that challenges to jurisdiction and
arbitrability are resolved correctly, promptly, and efficiently by
the appropriate decision maker.
I. INTRODUCTION
Arbitrators should be aware that the question whether
challenges to jurisdiction and arbitrability are to be
decided by courts or arbitrators is a subject of complex
and evolving case law.
Arbitrators generally have authority over only those parties who have
agreed to arbitrate and those disputes that fall within the terms of the
parties’ written arbitration agreement. Technically, arbitral authority over
persons should properly be referred to as jurisdiction, whereas arbitrability
should refer to whether the subject matter of the parties’ dispute is within
the scope of the arbitration agreement or whether public policy bars
arbitration of certain kinds of disputes, for example, claims for violation of
statutory rights. (Although the United States Supreme Court has frequently
held that disputes that arise from federal statutes, such as antitrust,
securities, racketeering, and employment disputes—both statutory and
otherwise—are arbitrable, there always remains the possibility that Congress
will exempt some statute-based claims from being arbitrated.) The terms
jurisdiction and arbitrability are often used interchangeably in case law and
literature and such usage unavoidably carries over to this chapter.
When parties assert that the arbitrator lacks authority over the parties or
the subject matter, the question naturally arises regarding whether
arbitration is the proper forum to decide that issue. In certain
circumstances, questions of jurisdiction and arbitrability are properly
resolved only by a court. Often, however, such questions can and should
Table of Contents

 Chapter 4

DETERMINING JURISDICTION AND ARBITRABILITY
by R. Doak Bishop, Robert B. Davidson,
Barry H. Garfinkel, and June R. Lehrman
 
I. INTRODUCTION
II. LEGAL BACKGROUND
A. Prima Paint; Rent-a-Center, West; and the
Separability Doctrine
B. The First Options Clear and Unmistakable
Evidence Doctrine
C. Gateway (Procedural vs. Substantive)
Jurisdictional Issues
D. Conditions Precedent to Arbitration
E. Waiver
F. Illegality and Other Defenses Arguably Going
to the Making of the Contract 
III. PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING
JURISDICTIONAL AND ARBITRABILITY
OBJECTIONS
Author Detail

 R. Doak Bishop, Esq., Partner, King & Spalding, Houston, Texas

 

Robert B. Davidson, Esq., Executive Director, JAMS Arbitration Practice, New York, New York

 

Barry H. Garfinkel, Esq., Of Counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York, New York

 

June R. Lehrman, Esq., Los Angeles, California