Originally from:
International Antitrust Law & Policy: Fordham Corporate Law 2003 - Hardcover
International Antitrust Law & Policy: Fordham Corporate Law 2003 - PDF
Preview Page
Chapter 23
STATE INTERVENTION AND ACTION IN
EC COMPETITION LAW
Richard Wainwright† and André Bouquet††
I. INTRODUCTION
For historical reasons the relative importance of State intervention in
the economy varies substantially amongst the 15 EU Member States, and
the enlargement of the EU to 25 and more Member States will not reduce
these differences, on the contrary. In France there is a high degree of
political consensus that the State is and should remain an important actor
while in the United Kingdom the objective is that the State refrains from
intervening. This explains why in France State investments constitute
some 3% of the GDP (or 15% of total investment) while in the UK this
proportion is only 1.5% (or 8.3% of total investment).1 There are also
important differences between sectors. For energy, transport and water
supply there is a greater tendency to State intervention than for
manufacturing industries. These differences explain why, from the outset,
the issue of the application of competition rules to the State has been
approached so differently by each Member State, and consequently why it
has always been such a delicate political issue. As a consequence States
with an important public sector and a favorable political attitude towards
it were very keen to avoid interference with it, while States less favorably
inclined towards the public sector wanted to make sure their undertakings
would not be disadvantaged by public undertakings of other States.2
In principle the Treaty does not affect rules on property ownership
(Art. 295 EC, ex Art. 222). This provision was initially designed to protect
the Member States’ nationalisation programmes from intervention by
Community institutions.3 This principle has been re-enforced by the
Praise for the Fordham Corporate Law Series:
"... the predominant forum for discussion of leading edge international antitrust issues. Both the conference and the published volume of proceedings are eagerly awaited events on the annual antitrust calendar."
- A. Neil Campbell, Vice Chairman of Committee C, (Antitrust and Trade Law) International Bar Association, and;
- J. William Rowley Former Chairman of Committee C, (Antitrust and Trade Law) International Bar Association.
"This is the largest single source of information and analysis on Community (now European Union) antitrust law anywhere. ... Also, some of the older papers are still the best statement of the legal principles in certain areas, even if there is recent case law."
- Common Market Law Review
"The Panel discussions which come at the end of the articles on a given topic are not only a valuable source of information, but provide an insight into existing and potential future problems together with possible solutions."
- World Competition