As an introduction to this issue it must first be mentioned that rules governing Argentine court procedures are passed locally by the legislature of each Argentine Province. Hence, they may vary from one Province to another.

Designed to give practical information and guidance to lawyers and businessmen who are interested in securing expected future judgments and in making strategic decisions.

According to Belgian civil procedural law, a distinction has to be made between conservatory attachments (bewarend beslag, saisie conservatoire/seizure for security) and attachments in execution
(uitvoerend beslag, saisie exécutoire/enforcement of judgments).

The law relating to Writs of Attachment is provided for in The Supreme Court of Judicature Act (SCJA) Chapter 82 of the Laws of Belize in an indirect manner and does not cover all of the areas addressed by the questions hereto.

In the narrow sense of the word attachment is available to any person having a just cause of action at law against any person or persons absent from Bermuda but who has been in Bermuda by way of Writ of Attachment under the Attachment Act, 1874.

The general nature of an attachment is to avoid the mockery of the plaintiff’s rights. Under Bolivian law a plaintiff’s rights against a debtor can be secured by affecting the property of said debtor.

Prior to the commencement of the discussion on the enforcement of
foreign judgments, we will have a brief overview of the unique and
very peculiar constitutional set up of Bosnia and Herzegovina and its
administrative divisions.

In the absence of local Brunei decisions, the Brunei Courts still refer to English law decisions on similar statutes as well as English Common law as persuasive authorities. Furthermore, there is in Brunei the existence of a legislation entitled the Application of Laws Act (CAP 2) wherein Section 2 of the Application of Laws Act (Cap. 2) provides that:

Currently, the Code of Civil Procedure is being published in the Cambodian Official Gazette. This Code was adopted by the General Assembly and the Senate respectively on May 26, 2006 and June 23, 2006. It was promulgated by the King on July 06, 2006. According to the Article 587 of this Code, it shall be implemented in one year time after it has been promulgated.

In the Hong Kong SAR, the Mareva injuction is the primary judicial remedy available to a Plaintiff seeking to obtain provisional relief against a Defendant to prevent the dissipation of the Defendant’s assets pending judgment.

Whenever in any proceedings to obtain an attachment under Part 7 of the Civil Procedure Law, Cap. 7, it is suggested by the garnishee that the debt or property sought to be attached belongs to some third
person, or that any third person has a lien or charge upon it, the Court or Judge may order such third person to appear and state the nature and particulars of his claim upon such debt or property.

According to Section 74 ff. of the Czech Civil Procedural Code “Obcansky soudni rad” (hereinafter “CCPO”) before or within a court procedure, the Plaintiff “zalobce” may demand the court to issue a preliminary injunction “predbezne opatrení.” The debtor can be obligated to fulfill one of many options: to give money or property in court custody, not to dispose with his property or rights, do something (facere), not do anything (omitere), or withhold (pati).

The judicial measures available for plaintiff to obtain provisional relief affecting property of debtors consist of Provisional attachment or seizure, the effect of the measure is that the debtor is prevented
from the use of his assets and the disposition of it.

The rules governing attachment are contained in the Danish Administration of Justice Act, which provides numerous formal rules concerning the hearing of different types of case by the Danish courts. Part 56 of the Administration of Justice Act provides rules that detail the conditions for the levying of attachment.